Navigating Controversy in British Classrooms
A reflection on discussing the religious connections to terrorism within schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20377/rpb-1932Schlagworte:
Bildung, Terrorismusbekämpfung, kontroverse Themen, Prävention, Securitisation, Lehrkräfte, RadikalisierungAbstract
Gemäß der Präventionsstrategie der britischen Regierung (2011) spielen Sekundarschulen eine entscheidende Rolle dabei, Kinder davon abzuhalten, sich an terroristischen Aktivitäten zu beteiligen. Spätere Dokumente (HM Government, 2015; 2023) gehen noch weiter und verpflichten Schulen, eine aktive Rolle bei der Terrorismusbekämpfung zu übernehmen. Dies deutet darauf hin, dass Schulen Kinder nicht nur vor den Auswirkungen des Terrorismus schützen, sondern sie aktiv davon abhalten, sich an terroristischen Aktivitäten zu beteiligen. Es gibt jedoch viele Diskussionen darüber, wie (und warum) dieses kontroverse Thema im Unterricht behandelt wird. Dieser Artikel reflektiert die Daten aus sechs Fallstudien, in denen sowohl Lehrkräfte als auch Schülerinnen und Schüler der Sekundarstufe zu ihren Ansichten zu diesem Thema befragt wurden, wobei ein besonderer Schwerpunkt auf den Verbindungen lag, die die Lernenden zwischen Religion und Terrorismus herstellten. Er beleuchtet die Komplexität der Diskussion dieses Themas mit jungen Menschen und reflektiert den Zweck und die Art von Maßnahmen zur Terrorismusbekämpfung im Umfeld der Sekundarstufe.
Literaturhinweise
Busher, Joel; Jerome, Lee; Armstrong, Megan A.; Choudhury, Tufyal; da Silva, Raquel; Elwick, Alex; Fontana, Giuditta; James, Natalie; Lewis, James; Robson, Jenny; Svennevig, Hans & Thomas, Paul (2020). Conclusion: Reflections on the First Five Years of the Prevent Duty in Early Years, Primary, Secondary and Further Education. In Joel Busher & Lee Jerome (Eds.), The Prevent Duty in Education (pp. 159–169). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45559-0_9
Cole, Mike (2008). Introductory chapter: education and equality – conceptual and practical considerations. In Mike Cole (Ed.), Professional Attributes and Practice Meeting the QTS Standards (4th Edition) (pp. 1–22). David Fulton.
Cohen, Louis; Manion, Lawrence & Morrison, Keith (2007). Research Methods in Education (6th Edition). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053
Davies, Lynn (2009). Educating Against Extremism: Towards a Critical Politicisation of Young People. International Review of Education, 55(2), 183–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-008-9126-8
Durodie, Bill (2016). Securitising Education to Prevent Terrorism or Losing Direction? British Journal of Educational Studies, 64(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2015.1107023
Foucault, Michel (1991). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Penguin.
Foucault, Michel (2002). The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. Routledge Classics.
Gearon, Liam (2013). The Counter-Terrorism Classroom: Religion, Education and Security. Religious Education, 108(2), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344087.2013.767660
Gearon, Liam (2015). Education, Security and Intelligence Studies. British Journal of Educational Studies, 63(3), 263-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2015.1079363
Ghosh, Ratna & Chan, W. Y. Alice (2017). The role of religious education in countering religious extremism in diverse and interconnected societies. In Malini Sivasubramaniam & Ruth Hayhoe (Eds.), Religion and Education: Comparative and International Perspectives. (pp. 335–350) Symposium Books.
Hand, Michael (2008). What should we teach as controversial? A defence of the epistemic criterion. Educational Theory, 58(2), 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2008.00285.x
Heartfield, James (2002). The ‘Death of the Subject’ Explained. Sheffield-Hallam University Press.
Home Office (2021). Revised Prevent duty guidance: for Scotland. HM Government.
HM Government (2011). Prevent Strategy. The Stationary Office.
HM Government (2011b). Prevent Strategy. The Stationary Office.
HM Government (2015). Prevent Duty Guidance: for England and Wales, London. Crown Copyright.
HM Government (2023). Prevent Duty Guidance: Guidance for specific authorities in England and Wales. HH Global Ltd.
Jackson, Robert (2014). Addressing Religious Extremism: A positive approach for policy makers and practitioners. In Thomas Thorp & Daniel Cere (Eds.), Religion and Conflict: Responding to the Challenges (pp. 70–77). Tony Blair Faith Foundation.
Jerome, Lee & Elwick, Alex (2020). Teaching about terrorism, extremism and radicalisation: some implications for controversial issues pedagogy. Oxford Review of Education, 46(2), 222–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2019.1667318
Malik, Kenan (2009). From Fatwa to Jihad: The Rushdie Affair and Its Legacy. Atlantic Books.
Nelles, Wayne (2003). Theoretical Issues and Pragmatic Challenges for Education, Terrorism and Security Research. In Wayne Nelles (Ed.), Comparative Education, Terrorism and Human Security: From Critical Pedagogy to Peace Building? (pp. 11–31). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403982391_2
OSCE (Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe) (2007). Toledo Guiding Principles on Teaching about Religions and Beliefs in Public Schools. OSCE.
O’Donnell, Aislinn (2017). Pedagogical injustice and counter-terrorist education. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 12(2), 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197917698490
Oganesyan, Sergey S. (2018). Pedagogical Problems of Preventing and Controlling Religious Extremism and Terrorism Among Youth. In Sing K. Lo (Ed.), Education Environment for the Information Age, vol. 46 (pp. 543–553). Future Academy. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2018.09.02.63
Oulton, Christopher; Day, Vanessa; Dillon, Justin & Grace, Marcus (2004). Controversial issues – teachers’ attitudes and practices in the context of citizenship education. Oxford Review of Education, 30(4), 489–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498042000303973
Perry, William G. (1998). Forms of Ethical and Intellectual Development in the College Years. A Scheme. Jossey-Bass.
Quartermaine, Angela (2014). Pupils’ Perceptions of Terrorism from a sample of Secondary Schools in Warwickshire. University of Warwick.
Quartermaine, Angela (2016). The disposition of concern: an exploration into the affects of the power-knowledge dynamics uncovered during research into pupils’ perceptions of terrorism. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 40(5), 541–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727x.2016.1186631
Quartermaine, Angela (2019). Pupils’ perceptions of the religious links to terrorism. British Journal of Religious Education, 41(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2017.1361381
Quartermaine, Angela (2024). Challenging Terrorist Ideologies Through Education. In Laurens de Rooij (Ed.), British Muslims and Their Discourses (pp. 183–199). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45013-6_8
Shulman, Lee S. (1986). Those who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x015002004
Woodside, Arch G. (2010). Case Study Research: Theory, Methods, Practice. Emerald Group Publishers
Wooley, Richard (2010). Tackling Controversial Issues in the Primary School. Facing Life's Challenges with your Learners. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203848326
Yin, Robert K. (2008). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th Edition). SAGE Publications Inc.
Downloads
Veröffentlicht
Zitationsvorschlag
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Lizenz
Copyright (c) 2025 Angela Quartermaine
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International.
