Justification and Compromise in Contemporary Democratic Theory about Religion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20377/rpb-1966Keywords:
democratic theory, religion, compromise, justification, religious conflicts, democratic legitimacyAbstract
Contemporary societies are characterized by religious diversity and regularly face disagreements about the proper place of religion in public life and duties of the state and public institutions. In our contribution, we turn to democratic theory and show how it can inform debates about religion and possibilities to deal with conflicts over religion. Our claim is that two democratic theory approaches are especially suitable starting points for this endeavor. One we call the 'justification' centered approach, the other the 'compromise' centered approach. Both approaches have evolved in democratic theory as responses to the more general question of how democracies should legitimately deal with a diversity of viewpoints and clashes between opposing political preferences. Our goal is to show that these two democratic theory approaches propose different ways of dealing with (religious) diversity, which should not be seen as mutually exclusive, but as opportunities to shape democracy's responses to conflicts about religion in a multi-modal way. Recognizing the diversity of democratic theory approaches is therefore of particular importance for systematic attempts to analyze the relation between democratic theory and religion.
References
Amir-Moazami, S. (2022). Interrogating Muslims: The liberal-secular matrix of integration. Bloomsbury Academic.
Asad, T. (2018). Secular translations: Nation-state, modern self, and calculative reason. Columbia University Press.
Audi, R. (2011). Democratic authority and the separation of church and state. Oxford University Press.
Audi, R. (2020). Religion and democracy: Interactions, tensions, possibilities. Daedalus, 149(3), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01800
Bardon, A. (2021). The Pope’s Public Reason: A Religious yet Public Case for Welcoming Refugees. Migration and Society, 4(1), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.3167/arms.2021.040113
Brubaker, R. (2015). Religious dimensions of political conflict and violence. Sociological Theory, 33(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275115572153
Calkin, S., de Londras, F., & Heathcote, G. (2020). Abortion in Ireland: Introduction to the themed issue. Feminist Review, 124(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0141778919897684
Chambers, S. (2024). Contemporary democratic theory. Polity Press.
Cohen, J. L., & Laborde, C. (Eds.). (2016). Religion, secularism, and constitutional democracy. Columbia University Press.
Cooling, T. (2012). What is a controversial issue? Implications for the treatment of religious beliefs in education. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 33(2), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2012.694060
Dean, R., Rinne, J., & Geissel, B. (2019). Systematizing democratic systems approaches. Democratic Theory, 6(2), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.3167/dt.2019.060205
de Boer, J. H., & Westphal, M. (2023). Der Kompromiss in Geschichte und Gegenwart: Politische und historische Perspektiven. Neue Politische Literatur, 68, 140–170.
Eberle, C., & Cuneo, T. (2015). Religion and political theory. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2023 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2023/entries/religion-politics/
Elkink, J. A., Farrell, D. M., Marien, S., Reidy, T., & Suiter, J. (2020). The death of conservative Ireland? The 2018 abortion referendum. Electoral Studies, 65, Article 102142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102142
Farrell, D. M., Suiter, J., Harris, C., & Cunningham, K. (2020). The effects of mixed membership in a deliberative forum: The Irish Constitutional Convention of 2012–2014. Political Studies, 68(1), 54–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719830936
Fox, J. (2018). An introduction to religion and politics: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). Taylor & Francis.
Geuss, R. (2008). Philosophy and real politics. Princeton University Press.
Goodin, R. E. (2005). Sequencing deliberative moments. Acta Politica, 40, 182–196.
Greenawalt, K. (2020). Democracy and religion: Some variations and hard questions. Daedalus, 149(3), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01801
Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. F. (2014). The spirit of compromise: Why governing demands it and campaigning undermines it. Princeton University Press.
Habermas, J. (2005). Religion in der Öffentlichkeit: Kognitive Voraussetzungen für den öffentlichen Vernunftgebrauch religiöser und säkularer Bürger. In J. Habermas, Zwischen Naturalismus und Religion: Philosophische Aufsätze (pp. 119–154). Suhrkamp.
Habermas, J. (2023). Also a history of philosophy. Polity Press.
Hess, D. E., & McAvoy, P. (2014). The political classroom: Evidence and ethics in democratic education. Routledge.
Ho, L.-C., McAvoy, P., Hess, D., & Gibbs, B. (2017). Teaching and learning about controversial issues and topics in the social studies. In M. Manfra & C. Bolick (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of social studies research (pp. 319–335). Wiley.
Kindlinger, M., & Hahn-Laudenberg, K. (2023). German preservice teachers’ stances on criteria for discussing controversial issues in the classroom. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 47(3–4), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/23522798231206194
Koppelman, A. (2020). Gay rights vs. religious liberty? The unnecessary conflict. Oxford University Press.
Kymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural citizenship: A liberal theory of minority rights. Oxford University Press.
Laborde, C. (2015). Religion in the law: The disaggregation approach. Law and Philosophy, 34(6), 581–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-015-9236-y
Laborde, C. (2017). Liberalism’s religion. Harvard University Press.
Laborde, C., & Bardon, A. (Eds.). (2017). Religion in liberal political philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Lægaard, S. (2023). Religion in 21st-century political philosophy. In Oxford research encyclopedia of politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.2016
Lafont, C. (2017). Citizens in robes: The place of religion in constitutional democracies. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 43(4–5), 453–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453717695366
Lafont, C. (2020). Democracy without Shortcuts: A Participatory Conception of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford University Press.
Landemore, H. (2017). Inclusive constitution making and religious rights: Lessons from the Icelandic experiment. The Journal of Politics, 79(3), 762–779. https://doi.org/10.1086/690300
Landemore, H. (2020). When public participation matters: The 2010–2013 Icelandic constitutional process. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 18(1), 179–205. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moaa004
Ley, I. (2023). Religionsverfassungsrecht auf dem Prüfstand: Zur Zukunft des Verhältnisses von Staat und Religionsgemeinschaften. Kirche und Recht, 29(2), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.35998/kur-2023-0009
March, A. F. (2013). Rethinking Religious Reasons in Public Justification. American Political Science Review, 107(3), 523–539. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055413000269
Pow, J., & Garry, J. (2023). What happens when mini-publics are held in a deeply divided place? Evidence from Northern Ireland. PS: Political Science & Politics, 56(4), 572–578. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096523000409
Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. Columbia University Press.
Rostbøll, C. F. (2017). Democratic respect and compromise. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 20(5), 619–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2017.1328092
Schneider, U., & Willems, U. (2023). Eine der größten Erfindungen der Menschheit. In U. Schneider, U. Willems, & M. Fischer (Eds.), Kompromisse machen (pp. 3–5). Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung.
Seglow, J., & Shorten, A. (2019a). Introduction. In J. Seglow & A. Shorten (Eds.), Religion and political theory: Secularism, accommodation and the new challenges of religious diversity (pp. 1–19). Rowman & Littlefield International.
Seglow, J., & Shorten, A. (Eds.). (2019b). Religion and political theory: Secularism, accommodation and the new challenges of religious diversity. Rowman & Littlefield International.
Shorten, A. (2022). Multiculturalism: The political theory of diversity today. Polity.
Ungureanu, C., & Monti, P. (2017). Contemporary political philosophy and religion: Between public reason and pluralism. Routledge.
Weinstock, D. (2013). On the possibility of principled moral compromise. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 16(4), 537–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2013.810392
Weinstock, D. (2017). Compromise, pluralism, and deliberation. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 20(5), 636–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2017.1328093
Willems, U. (2016). Wertkonflikte als Herausforderung der Demokratie. Springer VS.
Zanetti, V. (2022). Spielarten des Kompromisses. Suhrkamp.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Svenja Ahlhaus, Manon Westphal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
