Why Can't We All Just Get Along? A Theology of Conflict

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20377/rpb-1924

Keywords:

Controversiality, Faith and Reason, Reasonable Pluralism, Religious Epistemology, Post-secular Society

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that controversiality is a necessary feature of theology: It is a reasonable expectation that theological issues will be controversial because theology is a hermeneutical science: It seeks to justify the rational acceptability of faith within the contexts of our time. It does not seek to transform the act of faith into either uncontroversial knowledge or uncontroversial matters of taste. In this paper, I offer three arguments in support of this main thesis: The argument from the distinction between faith and knowledge, the argument from the concept of religious truth and the argument from reasonable pluralism. After these epistemological considerations which come mainly from Systematic Theology, I draw some conclusions for Practical Theology and RE at the end of the paper. 

References

Bishop, John & McKaughan, Daniel J. (2023). Faith. In Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (Eds.), The

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2023 Edition).

Breul, Martin (2024). Karl Rahner und der philosophische Pragmatismus. Der christliche Glaube zwischen historischer Genese und universaler Geltung. Zeitschrift für Theologie und Philosophie, 146, 221-242.

Dalferth, Ingolf U. (2017). A Relaxed View of Metaphysics. Neo-Aristotelian Thomism and the Theological Legacy of Thomas Aquinas. Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche, 114, 49-81. https://doi.org/10.1628/004435417x14822419363982 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1628/004435417X14822419363982

Finlayson, James G. (2019). The Habermas-Rawls Debate. Columbia University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/finl16410

Forst, Rainer (2013). Toleration in Conflict, Past and Present. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139051200

Gruber, Judith; Schüßler, Micha el & Bobrowicz, Ryszard (2024). Dissenting Church. Exploring the Theological Power of Conflict and Disagreement. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56019-4

Habermas, Jürgen (2008). Between Naturalism and Religion. Polity Press.

Habermas, Jürgen (2023). Also a History of Philosophy. Volume 1: The Project of a Genealogy of Postmetaphysical Thinking. Polity Press.

Herbst, Jan-Hendrik (2023). Is Discussing Controversial Issues in RE a Magic Bullet to Promote Social Cohesion? Mapping Opportunities and Challenges Based on Previous Research. Journal of Empirical Theology, 36, 147-169. https://doi.org/10.1163/15709256-20231147 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15709256-20231147

Kant, Immanuel (1838). Religion within the Boundary of pure Reason (translated by J.W. Semple). Thomas Clark.

Metz, Johann Baptist (1980). Faith in History and Society. Towards a Practical Fundamental Theology. Burns and Oates.

Nagel, Thomas (2013). Mortal Questions. Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107341050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107341050

Rawls, John (1996). Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press.

Schnädelbach, Herbert (1992). Zur Rehabilitierung des animal rationale. Suhrkamp Verlag.

Stosch, Klaus von (2019). Wittgenstein’s Later Philosophy as Foundation of Comparative Theology. In Andrejc Gorazd & Daniel H. Weiss (Eds.), Interpreting Interreligious Situations with Wittgenstein (pp.73-96). Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004408050_005

Talisse, Robert B. (2009). Democracy and Moral Conflict. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635281 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635281

Taylor, Charles (2007). A Secular Age. Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-15

How to Cite

Breul, M. (2025) “Why Can’t We All Just Get Along? A Theology of Conflict”, Journal for Religion in Education, pp. 1–10. doi: 10.20377/rpb-1924.

Issue

Section

Articles